Wisconsin Counties Accepting
Waldo's E-Ticket

On August 31, 2026, Waldo joined the Wisconsin County Forests Association (WCFA) for a working session with county forestry staff to talk through what e-tickets would actually mean for a county forest program. Loggers and truckers are asking counties directly whether they can run e-tickets on county sales. Below is the list of Wisconsin Counties who are accepting Waldo's E-Ticket as a valid ticket in their county.
County Name
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Adams County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Ashland County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Barron County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Bayfield County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Burnett County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Chippewa County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Accepting Waldo's E-Ticket
Clark County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Douglas County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Eau Claire County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Florence County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Forest County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Iron County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Jackson County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Juneau County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Langlade County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Lincoln County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Marathon County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Marinette County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Monroe County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Oconto County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Oneida County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Polk County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Price County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Rusk County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Sawyer County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Taylor County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Vernon County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Vilas County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Washburn County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending
Wood County
Waldo's E-Ticket Status
Pending

Proof it works: The Bayfield County Pilot

Bayfield County ran a pilot on a red pine sale — one product, one tech-forward logger, three truckers. Over the job, about 125 tickets moved through Waldo across four destinations.

What that pilot found:

  • It worked. Tickets flowed from landing to mill without manual re-entry, and Bayfield exported the reconciled data straight into their existing Access database for billing and advance payments.
  • Records retention was solvable. Bayfield's biggest concern going in was being tied to Waldo for the 7-year records-retention window. Waldo added a photo-export feature during the pilot so scale slip images now live in the county's own system — no dependency.
  • Rollout to occasional users is the real challenge, not the technology. Bayfield's frequent truckers had no trouble. The open question is the trucker who shows up three times a year at 5 a.m. and needs to get a load moving before anyone's awake to help.

Bayfield ran e-tickets and paper tickets side by side for the pilot — a laminated sign on the landing told drivers "use Waldo, or fall back to a paper ticket and call the forester." That fallback is what most counties should expect on day one, not a sign of the system failing. The pilot answered the technical questions.


Talk to Us

If your county wants to explore either path — or just wants to see what Bayfield saw firsthand — reach out:

Jeff Courter,  — jeff@waldologs.com
Brady Bekkalabrady@waldologs.com

Steve Probst at Bayfield County has also offered to talk directly with other counties about his experience running the pilot.